RxDecoder My Rx
‹ All drugs

dabigatran etexilate

Sold as Pradaxa. Class: Direct thrombin inhibitors. First FDA approval 10/19/2010: 16 years on the US market.

This grade answers one narrow question: how strong is the public evidence and safety record behind this drug, and how clean is its money trail and court record? It is not a verdict on whether the drug is right for you.

C

Score breakdown (63/100)

Safety ×35%
F
Evidence ×25%
F
Regulatory ×15%
B
Money & lawsuits ×15%
A
Options ×10%
A

Safety: 48

Evidence: 38

Regulatory history: 77

Money & lawsuits: 100

Options: 100

FDA boxed warning

WARNING: (A) PREMATURE DISCONTINUATION OF PRADAXA INCREASES THE RISK OF THROMBOTIC EVENTS, and (B) SPINAL/EPIDURAL HEMATOMA WARNING: (A) PREMATURE DISCONTINUATION OF PRADAXA INCREASES THE RISK OF THROMBOTIC EVENTS, and (B) SPINAL/EPIDURAL HEMATOMA See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning (A) PREMATURE DISCONTINUATION OF PRADAXA INCREASES THE RISK OF THROMBOTIC EVENTS: Premature discontinuation of any oral anticoagulant, including PRADAXA, increases the risk of thrombotic events. To reduce this risk, consider coverage with another anticoagulant if PRADAXA is discontinued for a reason other than pathological bleeding or completion of a course of therapy ( 2.5 , 2.6 , 2.7 , 5.1 ). (B) SPINAL/EPIDURAL HEMATOMA: Epidural or spinal hematomas may occur in patients treated with PRADAXA who are receiving neuraxial anesthesia or undergoing spinal puncture. These hematomas may result in long-term or permanent paralysis ( 5.3 ). Monitor patients frequently for signs and symptoms of neurological impairment and if observed, treat urgently. Consider the benefits and risks before neuraxial intervention in patients who are or who need to be anticoagulated ( 5.3 ). (A) PREMATURE D...

Independent reviews and post-approval warnings

FDA Drug Safety Communications

Warnings the FDA chose to announce publicly after approval, as opposed to quiet label edits. Class-wide items name the drug's class, not this drug specifically.

WHO Essential Medicine

Listed on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines: a global expert panel judged it among the medicines a health system should always have, on evidence of value, not marketing.

What the FDA label says

Approved uses

Oral Pellets are a direct thrombin inhibitor indicated: For the treatment of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in pediatric patients aged 3 months to less than 12 years of age who have been treated with a parenteral anticoagulant for at least 5 days ( 1.1 ) To reduce the risk of recurrence of VTE in pediatric patients aged 3 months to less than 12 years of age who have been previously treated ( 1.2 ) 1.1 Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic Events in Pediatric Patients PRADAXA Oral Pellets are indicated for the treatment of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in pediatric patients aged 3 months to less than 12 years of age who have been treated with a parenteral anticoagulant for at least 5 days. 1.2 Reduction in the Risk of Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolic Events in Pediatric Patients PRADAXA Oral Pellets are indicated to reduce the risk of recurrence of VTE in pediatric patients aged 3 months to less than 12 years of age who have been previously treated.

Contraindications

is contraindicated in patients with: Active pathological bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) and Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] History of a serious hypersensitivity reaction to dabigatran, dabigatran etexilate, or to one of the excipients of the product (e.g., anaphylactic reaction or anaphylactic shock) [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] Mechanical prosthetic heart valve [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4) ] Active pathological bleeding ( 4 ) History of serious hypersensitivity reaction to PRADAXA ( 4 ) Mechanical prosthetic heart valve ( 4 )

Warnings and precautions

Bleeding: PRADAXA can cause serious and fatal bleeding ( 5.2 ) Bioprosthetic heart valves: PRADAXA use not recommended ( 5.4 ) Increased Risk of Thrombosis in Patients with Triple-Positive Antiphospholipid Syndrome: PRADAXA use not recommended ( 5.6 ) 5.1 Increased Risk of Thrombotic Events after Premature Discontinuation Premature discontinuation of any oral anticoagulant, including PRADAXA, in the absence of adequate alternative anticoagulation increases the risk of thrombotic events. If PRADAXA Oral Pellets are discontinued for a reason other than pathological bleeding or completion of a course of therapy, consider coverage with another anticoagulant and restart PRADAXA Oral Pellets as soon as medically appropriate [see Dosage and Administration (2.5 , 2.6 , 2.7) ]. 5.2 Risk of Bleeding PRADAXA increases the risk of bleeding and can cause significant and, sometimes, fatal bleeding. Promptly evaluate any signs or symptoms of blood loss (e.g., a drop in hemoglobin and/or hematocrit or hypotension). Discontinue PRADAXA Oral Pellets in patients with active pathological bleeding [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) ]. Risk factors for bleeding include the concomitant use of other dru...

Adverse reactions (label)

The following clinically significant adverse reactions are described elsewhere in the labeling: Increased Risk of Thrombotic Events after Premature Discontinuation [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] Risk of Bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ] Spinal/Epidural Anesthesia or Puncture [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ] Thromboembolic and Bleeding Events in Patients with Prosthetic Heart Valves [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4) ] Increased Risk of Thrombosis in Patients with Triple-Positive Antiphospholipid Syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) ] The most serious adverse reactions reported with PRADAXA were related to bleeding [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ] . Most common adverse reactions (> 15%) are gastrointestinal adverse reactions and bleeding. ( 6.1 ) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at (800) 542-6257 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch . 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reactions rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug an...

Source: FDA SPL label for Pradaxa (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), effective 20250627. Full label on DailyMed.

Side-effect reports sent to the FDA

These are counts of reports people filed, not rates of harm. Anyone can file one, and nobody checks whether the drug was the cause. Millions of doses are taken for every report sent, so the useful part is how this drug compares with the average across all drugs.

45,092reports that mention this drug
44,983of those blame this drug, not another one the person was taking
85%of reports describe a serious outcome, such as a hospital stay (average for all drugs: 57%)
15.0%of reports include a death, from any cause (average for all drugs: 9.1%)

Problems reported most often

Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage · 4,186Cerebrovascular Accident · 2,345Fall · 2,214Ischaemic Stroke · 1,627Anaemia · 1,615Haemorrhage · 1,411Death · 1,336Atrial Fibrillation · 1,289Dyspnoea · 1,245Off Label Use · 1,156Acute Kidney Injury · 1,047Rectal Haemorrhage · 1,031Cerebral Haemorrhage · 997Drug Ineffective · 969Dizziness · 934

Reports per year

20192020202120222023202420252026
4,5033,3942,7222,2091,162970831362

2,699 reports blaming this drug for every million Medicare prescriptions filled, which is 1.0× the typical drug on this site. (2,109 reports in 2024–2026, against 781,528 Medicare fills in one year. This is the one number here that accounts for how many people take the drug.)

Source: the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reports are voluntary and unverified. Drugs that are prescribed a lot, in the news, or in lawsuits attract more reports, so the percentages are compared with the whole database to correct for that partly, not fully.

Recalls and regulatory record

9recall actions on file
2 / 9brand / generic applications
6label changes since 2021
NoREMS program
DateClassFirmReason
07/2026Class IIIAscend Laboratories, LLCFailed impurity/degradation specification: an OOS result observed in Related substance test analysis w.r.t Impurity II, Impurity III and Total impurities for 12-month stability
07/2026Class IIIAscend Laboratories, LLCFailed impurity/degradation specification: an OOS result observed in Related substance test analysis w.r.t Impurity II, Impurity III and Total impurities for 12-month stability
07/2026Class IIIAscend Laboratories, LLCFailed impurity/degradation specification: an OOS result observed in Related substance test analysis w.r.t Impurity II, Impurity III and Total impurities for 12-month stability
06/2026Class IIIAscend Laboratories, LLCFailed Impurities/Degradation Specifications: OOS result was observed during the related substance test analysis with respect to Impurity II, Impurity III and Total impurity testing for 12 Month Long-Term Stability.
06/2026Class IIIAscend Laboratories, LLCFailed Impurities/Degradation Specifications: OOS result was observed during the related substance test analysis with respect to Impurity II, Impurity III and Total impurity testing for 12 Month Long-Term Stability.
12/2024Class IIAscend Laboratories, LLCCGMP Deviations: Presence of N-nitroso-Dabigatran impurity above recommended interim limit
12/2024Class IIAscend Laboratories, LLCCGMP Deviations: Presence of N-nitroso-Dabigatran impurity above recommended interim limit
03/2023Class IIAscend Laboratories, LLCCGMP Deviations: Detection of N-nitroso-dabigatran (NDAB) impurity levels above the Acceptable Daily Intake Limit.
03/2023Class IIAscend Laboratories, LLCCGMP Deviations: Detection of N-nitroso-dabigatran (NDAB) impurity levels above the Acceptable Daily Intake Limit.

Class I = reasonable probability of serious harm. Class II = temporary or reversible harm. Class III = unlikely to harm. Most generic recalls are manufacturing or labeling defects for one lot, not a verdict on the molecule.

Evidence base

32randomized trials (PubMed)
9systematic reviews
413registered trials
47%of completed trials posted results
9%terminated or withdrawn
51%industry-funded

Counts measure how much evidence exists and how transparent it is, not how big the benefit is. For that, ask your prescriber: if 100 people like me took this, how many would get better because of it, and how many would be harmed? (Doctors call these the "number needed to treat" and "number needed to harm.") It differs by condition and is the number drug ads leave out. Sources: PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Money and lawsuits

In 2024, drug companies reported $0 in payments to US physicians and hospitals tied to this drug across 0 transactions.

No pending federal MDL names this drug or its brands.

Not named in any federal pharmaceutical settlement of $100M or more on record.

Sources: CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act); Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation pending docket list; DOJ settlements as tabulated on Wikipedia with links to the primary record. State-court and individual suits are not included.

Who takes it and what it costs

246,553Medicare Part D patients (2024)
781,528prescriptions filled
$255average cost per fill
$199Mtotal Medicare spend
ProductFills$/fill
Pradaxa481,836$256
Dabigatran Etexilate299,692$254

Same-class alternatives

argatrobanbivalirudindesirudinlepirudin

Same ATC pharmacological class, graded ones first, best grade at the top. Being in the same class does not make them interchangeable for your condition; it makes them worth asking about.

Questions to ask your prescriber

  1. In 2014 the FDA issued a safety communication about this drug (FDA study of Medicare patients finds risks lower for stroke and death but higher for gastrointestinal bleeding). Does that risk apply to me?
  2. This drug carries a boxed warning. Which specific risk does it cover, and does it apply to me?
  3. The most-reported problems in FDA's adverse event data are gastrointestinal haemorrhage, cerebrovascular accident, fall, ischaemic stroke. How would we recognize and handle those?
  4. Why this one over argatroban, bivalirudin, desirudin? What would make you pick one of those instead?
  5. What result are we expecting, by when, and what is the plan if it does not happen?
  6. If 100 people like me took this drug, how many would actually get better because of it, and how many would be harmed by it? (Doctors call these the number needed to treat and the number needed to harm.)